While FRTB was not intended to increase banks’ capital costs beyond those imposed by Basel II.5, it is clear from both BCBS and industry analysis that banks will see significant increases in their cost of capital, in particular to support their trading activities. Given the potential impacts for secondary bond market efficiency and liquidity, the final calibration and implementation of FRTB are key priorities of ICMA’s Secondary Market Practices Committee (SMPC).
27 March 2020
Governors and Heads of Supervision announce deferral of Basel III implementation to increase operational capacity of banks and supervisors to respond to Covid-19.
The Basel Committee's oversight body, the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), has endorsed a set of measures to provide additional operational capacity for banks and supervisors to respond to the immediate financial stability priorities resulting from the impact of the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) on the global banking system.
Summary of revised implementation timeline:
27 March 2020
Governors and Heads of Supervision announce deferral of Basel III implementation to increase operational capacity of banks and supervisors to respond to COVID-19
The Basel Committee's oversight body, the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), has endorsed a set of measures to provide additional operational capacity for banks and supervisors to respond to the immediate financial stability priorities resulting from the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on the global banking system.
Summary of revised implementation timeline:
27 March 2020
EBA publishes final draft standards on key areas for the EU implementation of the FRTB
The European Banking Authority (EBA) publishes final draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on the new Internal Model Approach (IMA) under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB). These technical standards conclude the first phase of the EBA roadmap towards the implementation of the market and counterparty credit risk frameworks in the EU.
These final draft technical standards cover 11 mandates and have been grouped in three different documents: the final RTS on liquidity horizons for the IMA; the final draft RTS on back-testing and profit and loss attribution (PLA) requirements; and the final draft RTS on criteria for assessing the modellability of risk factors under the IMA.
- Final draft RTS on liquidity horizons for the IM
- Final draft RTS on back-testing and PLA requirement
- Final draft RTS on criteria for assessing the modellability of risk factors under the IMA
February 2020
The ECB Banking Supervision has published the results of a questionnaire surveying banks on the impact of the new FRTB rules on their use of internal models. The ECB has drawn several conclusions from the banks’ responses, which reflect their thinking as at mid-2019:
- Approximately 40% of the banks currently using the internal models approach intend to seek IMA approval under the new rules. Roughly half of these banks aim to include as many trading desks as possible under the IMA, while the other half plan to include only a subset of their trading desks. Approximately 40% of respondents intend to move from the IMA to the new standardised approach. The remaining 20% are currently undecided.
- Some banking groups have indicated that they may apply for IMA approval under the new rules at the consolidated, sub-consolidated or solo level only, while others will do so for several consolidation levels. Most approvals could be handled within the Single Supervisory Mechanism, while some would require coordination with outside supervisors.
- The number and importance of trading desks covered by the internal models approach vary significantly across banks.
EBA publishes final draft standards on key aspects related to the implementation of the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk
The final draft RTS set out the method for identifying the material risk drivers of derivative transactions on the basis of which the mapping to one or more of the risk categories is to be done. In addition, these RTS set out the formula that institutions are to use to calculate the supervisory delta of options, when mapped to the interest rate risk category, which is compatible with negative interest rates. Finally, the final draft RTS introduce a method suitable for determining the direction of the position in a material risk driver.
May 2019
EBA launches consultation on technical standards on the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk.
On 2 May 2019, the European Banking Authority (EBA) launched a consultation on four draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on the Standardised Approach for Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR). These draft technical standards specify key aspects of the SA-CCR and represent an important contribution to its smooth harmonised implementation in the EU. The draft technical standards were developed based on the mandates included in the latest available version of proposed amended Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2). The consultation runs until 2 August 2019.
Consultation paper on draft RTS on the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk
Draft technical standards on the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk
January 2019
At its meeting in Basel on Monday 14 January 2019, the Basel Committee's oversight body, the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), endorsed a set of revisions to the market risk framework intended to enhance its design and calibration by:
- introducing a simplified standardised approach for banks with small or non-complex trading portfolios;
- clarifying the scope of exposures that are subject to market risk capital requirements;
- enhancing the risk sensitivity of the standardised approach by revising the treatment of foreign exchange risk, index instruments and options;
- revising the standardised approach risk weights applicable to general interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and selected credit spread risk exposures;
- revamping the assessment process to determine whether a bank's internal risk management models appropriately reflect the risks of individual trading desks (the so-called profit and loss attribution test); and
- revising the requirements for identifying risk factors that are eligible for internal modelling and the capital requirement applicable to risk factors that are deemed non-modellable.
The revised market risk framework will take effect as of 1 January 2022, concurrent with the implementation of the Basel III reforms endorsed by the GHOS in December 2017. A description of the background, objectives and overall impact of the market risk framework is set out in an accompanying explanatory note.
September 2018
ECB publishes the three risk-type-specific chapters of its guide to internal models for consultation. These chapters, on credit risk, market risk and counterparty credit risk, are intended to ensure a common and consistent approach to the most relevant aspects of the applicable regulations on internal models for banks directly supervised by the ECB. The consultation ends on 7 November 2018.
March 2018
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has published a Consultative Document on proposed revisions to the minimum capital requirements for market risk (also known as the “Fundamental Review of the Trading Book”). This proposal largely aim to address industry concerns and recommendations arising from the 2016 framework, Minimum capital requirements for market risk.
Among the various proposed revisions being consulted on are:
- A more sensitive floor for the ‘low correlation’ scenario to reflect more realistically market conditions in the standardized sensitivity based approach (SBA)
- A number of modifications to the (internal model approach) P&L attribution test, including:
- Better data alignment between the ‘hypothetical P&L’ and ‘risk-theoretical P&L’
- Quarterly rather than monthly test frequency
- An observation period of 12 months (rather than 1 month)
- A ‘traffic light’ approach to the penalty capital function
- A number of modifications to the IMA process for non-modellable risk factors (NMRFs), including:
- Acknowledgment of the usefulness of data pooling
- Allowing banks to use their own quotes
- A revision of what constitutes a trading desk
- A proposal for a (more conservative) simplified SA (for smaller banks)
Briefing notes and resources
January 2019
BCBS: Minimum capital requirements for market risk
September 2018
ECB guide to internal models: Risk-type-specific chapters
June 2018
Industry response to BCBS consultation on revisions to the minimum capital requirements for market risk
March 2018
BCBS Consultative Document: Revisions to the minimum capital requirements for market risk (March 2018)
February 2018
Fundamental Review of The Trading Book - The road to IMA, a presentation by Eduardo Epperlein of Nomura for the ICMA Secondary Market Practices Committee
January 2018
An ICMA briefing note on implementation challenges of FRTB for secondary bond markets
December 2017
Basel Committee announces delay to FRTB implementation until 2022 (Dec 2017)
BCBS: Basel III Monitoring Report (Dec 2017)
EBA Discussion Paper: Implementation in the European Union of the revised market risk and counterparty credit risk frameworks (Dec 2017)
May 2017
IHS Markit/Oliver Wyman, FRTB Markit Modelability Model: preliminary results (May 2017)
January 2017
BCBS: Frequently asked questions on market risk capital requirements (Jan 2017)
November 2016
European Commission: Proposed regulation amending the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR II) (Nov 2016)
January 2016
BCBS: Minimum capital requirements for market risk (Jan 2016)
November 2015
ISDA/GFMA/IIF: FRTB QIS Analysis (Nov 2015)
An ICMA briefing note on the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book